Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] fs: Add inode_assert_locked() and inode_assert_locked_excl()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/7/23, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +static inline void inode_assert_locked_excl(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	rwsem_assert_held_write(&inode->i_rwsem);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void inode_lock_nested(struct inode *inode, unsigned
> subclass)
>  {
>  	down_write_nested(&inode->i_rwsem, subclass);

Why "excl" instead of "write"? Apart from looking weird, it is
inconsistent with "prior art" in the file: i_mmap_assert_write_locked.

-- 
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux