Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/gup: make failure to pin an error if FOLL_NOWAIT not specified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01.10.23 18:00, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
There really should be no circumstances under which a non-FOLL_NOWAIT GUP
operation fails to return any pages, so make this an error.

To catch the trivial case, simply exit early if nr_pages == 0.

This brings __get_user_pages_locked() in line with the behaviour of its
nommu variant.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/gup.c | 11 +++++++++++
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index b21b33d1787e..fb2218d74ca5 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1471,6 +1471,9 @@ static __always_inline long __get_user_pages_locked(struct mm_struct *mm,
  	long ret, pages_done;
  	bool must_unlock = false;
+ if (!nr_pages)
+		return 0;
+

Probably unlikely() is reasonable. I even wonder if WARN_ON_ONCE() would be appropriate, but likely there are weird callers that end up calling this with nr_pages==0 ... probably they should be identified and changed. Future work.

  	/*
  	 * The internal caller expects GUP to manage the lock internally and the
  	 * lock must be released when this returns.
@@ -1595,6 +1598,14 @@ static __always_inline long __get_user_pages_locked(struct mm_struct *mm,
  		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
  		*locked = 0;
  	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Failing to pin anything implies something has gone wrong except when
+	 * FOLL_NOWAIT is specified, so explicitly make this an error.
+	 */
+	if (pages_done == 0 && !(flags & FOLL_NOWAIT))
+		return -EFAULT;
+

But who would be affected by that and why do we care about adding this check?

This smells like a "if (WARN_ON_ONCE())", correct?

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux