On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:59:23AM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote: > With 0x%p, the pointer will be hashed and print (____ptrval____) instead. > And with 0x%pa, the pointer can be successfully printed but with duplicate > prefixes, which looks like: > > kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0x(____ptrval____)) > kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0x0000000a1af86000) > > Use %pa instead of 0x%p or 0x%pa to print the pointer, and use 0x%px for > __percpu pointer to prevent crash. Then the print will be like: Why not %px in all cases? -- Catalin
