Re: ANON_LARGE_FOLIOS meeting follow-up & refined proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25.09.23 10:51, Ryan Roberts wrote:
On 23/09/2023 01:33, John Hubbard wrote:
On 9/22/23 08:48, Ryan Roberts wrote:
...
I never had any feedback on the below; I'm not sure if that means everyone is
happy or that nobody read it??

One can never really know: zero or more people read it, and of those, no
one hated it enough to send out a quick NAK. So that's a *possible*,
lukewarm endorsement of sorts. Success! :)

You really know how to fill a guy with confidence! ;-)


...

BUT I've had yet another idea on the controls front, which would enable exposing
this to user space as an extension to transparent_hugepage, while continuing to
support THP as is and also be able to control THP and ALF (anon large folio)

The new ALF / ANON_LARGE_FOLIO naming looks good to me. The grep aspect
is a nice touch.

Well if we go the route of the newest proposal, then I guess the naming is less
important, because it all attaches to transparent_hugepage.

I agree that ALF is better. But having something under "THP", that is not THP and not accounted as THP ... I don't quite like it (although, before we discussed that approach in the past, I did like it).

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux