In page allocator, PCP (Per-CPU Pageset) is refilled and drained in
batches to increase page allocation throughput, reduce page
allocation/freeing latency per page, and reduce zone lock contention.
But too large batch size will cause too long maximal
allocation/freeing latency, which may punish arbitrary users. So the
default batch size is chosen carefully (in zone_batchsize(), the value
is 63 for zone > 1GB) to avoid that.
In commit 3b12e7e97938 ("mm/page_alloc: scale the number of pages that
are batch freed"), the batch size will be scaled for large number of
page freeing to improve page freeing performance and reduce zone lock
contention. Similar optimization can be used for large number of
pages allocation too.
To find out a suitable max batch scale factor (that is, max effective
batch size), some tests and measurement on some machines were done as
follows.
A set of debug patches are implemented as follows,
- Set PCP high to be 2 * batch to reduce the effect of PCP high
- Disable free batch size scaling to get the raw performance.
- The code with zone lock held is extracted from rmqueue_bulk() and
free_pcppages_bulk() to 2 separate functions to make it easy to
measure the function run time with ftrace function_graph tracer.
- The batch size is hard coded to be 63 (default), 127, 255, 511,
1023, 2047, 4095.
Then will-it-scale/page_fault1 is used to generate the page
allocation/freeing workload. The page allocation/freeing throughput
(page/s) is measured via will-it-scale. The page allocation/freeing
average latency (alloc/free latency avg, in us) and allocation/freeing
latency at 99 percentile (alloc/free latency 99%, in us) are measured
with ftrace function_graph tracer.
The test results are as follows,
Sapphire Rapids Server
======================
Batch throughput free latency free latency alloc latency alloc latency
page/s avg / us 99% / us avg / us 99% / us
----- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- -------------
63 513633.4 2.33 3.57 2.67 6.83
127 517616.7 4.35 6.65 4.22 13.03
255 520822.8 8.29 13.32 7.52 25.24
511 524122.0 15.79 23.42 14.02 49.35
1023 525980.5 30.25 44.19 25.36 94.88
2047 526793.6 59.39 84.50 45.22 140.81
Ice Lake Server
===============
Batch throughput free latency free latency alloc latency alloc latency
page/s avg / us 99% / us avg / us 99% / us
----- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- -------------
63 620210.3 2.21 3.68 2.02 4.35
127 627003.0 4.09 6.86 3.51 8.28
255 630777.5 7.70 13.50 6.17 15.97
511 633651.5 14.85 22.62 11.66 31.08
1023 637071.1 28.55 42.02 20.81 54.36
2047 638089.7 56.54 84.06 39.28 91.68
Cascade Lake Server
===================
Batch throughput free latency free latency alloc latency alloc latency
page/s avg / us 99% / us avg / us 99% / us
----- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- -------------
63 404706.7 3.29 5.03 3.53 4.75
127 422475.2 6.12 9.09 6.36 8.76
255 411522.2 11.68 16.97 10.90 16.39
511 428124.1 22.54 31.28 19.86 32.25
1023 414718.4 43.39 62.52 40.00 66.33
2047 429848.7 86.64 120.34 71.14 106.08
Commet Lake Desktop
===================
Batch throughput free latency free latency alloc latency alloc latency
page/s avg / us 99% / us avg / us 99% / us
----- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- -------------
63 795183.13 2.18 3.55 2.03 3.05
127 803067.85 3.91 6.56 3.85 5.52
255 812771.10 7.35 10.80 7.14 10.20
511 817723.48 14.17 27.54 13.43 30.31
1023 818870.19 27.72 40.10 27.89 46.28
Coffee Lake Desktop
===================
Batch throughput free latency free latency alloc latency alloc latency
page/s avg / us 99% / us avg / us 99% / us
----- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- -------------
63 510542.8 3.13 4.40 2.48 3.43
127 514288.6 5.97 7.89 4.65 6.04
255 516889.7 11.86 15.58 8.96 12.55
511 519802.4 23.10 28.81 16.95 26.19
1023 520802.7 45.30 52.51 33.19 45.95
2047 519997.1 90.63 104.00 65.26 81.74
>From the above data, to restrict the allocation/freeing latency to be
less than 100 us in most times, the max batch scale factor needs to be
less than or equal to 5.
So, in this patch, the batch scale factor is restricted to be less
than or equal to 5.
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 06aa9c5687e0..30554c674349 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ typedef int __bitwise fpi_t;
*/
#define FPI_TO_TAIL ((__force fpi_t)BIT(1))
+/* Maximum PCP batch scale factor to restrict max allocation/freeing latency */
+#define PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX 5
+
/* prevent >1 _updater_ of zone percpu pageset ->high and ->batch fields */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcp_batch_high_lock);
#define MIN_PERCPU_PAGELIST_HIGH_FRACTION (8)
@@ -2340,7 +2343,7 @@ static int nr_pcp_free(struct per_cpu_pages *pcp, int high, bool free_high)
* freeing of pages without any allocation.
*/
batch <<= pcp->free_factor;
- if (batch < max_nr_free)
+ if (batch < max_nr_free && pcp->free_factor < PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX)
pcp->free_factor++;
batch = clamp(batch, min_nr_free, max_nr_free);
--
2.39.2
