Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19/09/2023 16:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19 2023 at 15:21, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 19/09/2023 14:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
If you're working on one of them, then surely it's a simple matter of
working on adding CONFIG_PREEMPT support :-)
In the case of UML adding preempt will be quite difficult. I looked at
this a few years back.
What's so difficult about it?

It's been a while. I remember that I dropped it at the time, but do not remember the full details.

There was some stuff related to FP state and a few other issues I ran into while rewriting the interrupt controller. Some of it may be resolved by now as we are using host cpu flags, etc.

I can give it another go :)


Thanks,

         tglx

--
Anton R. Ivanov
Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Company Number 10273661
https://www.cambridgegreys.com/





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux