Re: [PATCH 1/3] proc: add /proc/kpageorder interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(6/4/12 4:23 AM), Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2012 22:31:01 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
(6/1/12 12:54 PM), Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz<b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] proc: add /proc/kpageorder interface

This makes page order information available to the user-space.

No usecase new feature always should be NAKed.

It is used to get page orders for Buddy pages and help to monitor
free/used pages.  Sample usage will be posted for inclusion to
Pagemap Demo tools (http://selenic.com/repo/pagemap/).

The similar situation is with /proc/kpagetype..

NAK then.

First, your explanation didn't describe any usecase. "There is a similar feature"
is NOT a usecase.

Second, /proc/kpagetype is one of mistaken feature. It was not designed deeply.
We have no reason to follow the mistake.

Third, pagemap demo doesn't describe YOUR feature's usefull at all.

Fourth, pagemap demo is NOT useful at all. It's just toy. Practically, kpagetype
is only used from pagetype tool.

Firnally, you have to learn what "usecase" mean.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]