On 2023/9/18 13:43, SeongJae Park wrote: > Hi Jinjie, > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:10:44 +0800 Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The damon_ctx which is allocated by kzalloc() in damon_new_ctx() in >> damon_test_ops_registration() and damon_test_set_attrs() are not freed and >> it causes below memory leak. So use damon_destroy_ctx() to free it. >> >> unreferenced object 0xffff2b49c6968800 (size 512): >> comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 350, jiffies 4294895294 (age 557.028s) >> hex dump (first 32 bytes): >> 88 13 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0 86 01 00 00 00 00 00 ................ >> 00 87 93 03 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ >> backtrace: >> [<0000000088e71769>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 >> [<0000000073acab3b>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 >> [<00000000b5f89cef>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164 >> [<00000000eb19e83f>] damon_new_ctx+0x28/0xb4 >> [<00000000daf6227b>] damon_test_ops_registration+0x34/0x328 >> [<00000000559c4801>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac >> [<000000003932ed49>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c >> [<000000003c3e9211>] kthread+0x124/0x130 >> [<0000000028f85bdd>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 >> unreferenced object 0xffff2b49c1a9cc00 (size 512): >> comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 356, jiffies 4294895306 (age 557.000s) >> hex dump (first 32 bytes): >> 88 13 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0 86 01 00 00 00 00 00 ................ >> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ >> backtrace: >> [<0000000088e71769>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 >> [<0000000073acab3b>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 >> [<00000000b5f89cef>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164 >> [<00000000eb19e83f>] damon_new_ctx+0x28/0xb4 >> [<00000000058495c4>] damon_test_set_attrs+0x30/0x1a8 >> [<00000000559c4801>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac >> [<000000003932ed49>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c >> [<000000003c3e9211>] kthread+0x124/0x130 >> [<0000000028f85bdd>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > Same to the comment on the first patch of this patchset, simply letting others > know the name of the tool you used for making this cool output could be > helpful. Could you please add it? > > Also, I prefer adding four spaces indent to quoted command outputs on commit > messages. Could you please add that indentation? > > Also, I cannot 'git am' this patch on top of mm-unstable[1]. Could you please > double check and rebase on latest mm-unstable if I din't miss something? > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git/log/?h=mm-unstable Sure. Thank you very much! > >> >> Fixes: d1836a3b2a9a ("mm/damon/core-test: initialise context before test in damon_test_set_attrs()") >> Fixes: 4f540f5ab4f2 ("mm/damon/core-test: add a kunit test case for ops registration") >> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> mm/damon/core-test.h | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h >> index 255f8c925c00..ce86ed30fb47 100644 >> --- a/mm/damon/core-test.h >> +++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h >> @@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ static void damon_test_ops_registration(struct kunit *test) >> >> /* Check double-registration failure again */ >> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_register_ops(&ops), -EINVAL); >> + >> + damon_destroy_ctx(c); >> } >> >> static void damon_test_set_regions(struct kunit *test) >> @@ -342,6 +344,8 @@ static void damon_test_set_attrs(struct kunit *test) >> invalid_attrs = valid_attrs; >> invalid_attrs.aggr_interval = 4999; >> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_set_attrs(c, &invalid_attrs), -EINVAL); >> + >> + damon_destroy_ctx(c); >> } >> >> static void damos_test_new_filter(struct kunit *test) > > Other than above comments, changes look good to me. > >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> > > Thanks, > SJ
