David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was thinking of import_iovec() - or whatever its current > name is. That doesn't actually access the buffer described by the iovec[]. > That really needs a single structure that contains the iov_iter > and the cache[] (which the caller pretty much always allocates > in the same place). cache[]? > Fiddling with that is ok until you find what io_uring does. > Then it all gets entirely horrid. That statement sounds like back-of-the-OLS-T-shirt material ;-) David
