On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:31:39PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 11:23:29AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Things aren't happy with that patch at all. > > > > Yeah, at this point I think we need to just revert the compaction changes. > > > > Guys, what's the minimal set of commits to revert? That clearly buggy > > "rescue_unmovable_pageblock()" function was introduced by commit > > 5ceb9ce6fe94, but is that actually involved with the particular bug? > > That commit seems to revert cleanly still, but is that sufficient or > > does it even matter? > > I'l rerun the test with that (and Hugh's last patch) backed out, and see > if that makes any difference. running just over two hours with that commit reverted with no obvious ill effects so far. Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>