hi, Raghu, On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:45:18AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: > On 9/12/2023 7:54 PM, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > hi, Raghu, > > > > hope this third performance report for same one patch-set won't annoy you, > > and better, have some value to you. > > Not at all. But thanks a lot and am rather more happy to see this > exhaustive results. > > Because: It is easy to show see that patchset is increasing readability > of code or maintainance of code etc., > while I try my best to see regressions are within noise level for some > corner cases and some benchmarks have improved noticeably, there is > always a room to miss something. > Reports like this, helps to boost confidence on patchset. > > Also your cumulative (bisection) report also helped to evaluate > importance of each patch too.. ok, will keep sending report if any :) > > > > > I hope I can add your tested-by if I need to REBASE the patch for -mm > tree depending on the feedback I get any further with any minor changes. sure! Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> > > >
