> On Sep 11, 2023, at 9:25 PM, Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hi, Chuck Lever,
>
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 02:43:22PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 8, 2023, at 1:26 AM, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> kernel test robot noticed a -19.0% regression of aim9.disk_src.ops_per_sec on:
>>>
>>>
>>> commit: a2e459555c5f9da3e619b7e47a63f98574dc75f1 ("shmem: stable directory offsets")
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>>
>>> testcase: aim9
>>> test machine: 48 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz (Ivy Bridge-EP) with 112G memory
>>> parameters:
>>>
>>> testtime: 300s
>>> test: disk_src
>>> cpufreq_governor: performance
>>>
>>>
>>> In addition to that, the commit also has significant impact on the following tests:
>>>
>>> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>> | testcase: change | aim9: aim9.disk_src.ops_per_sec -14.6% regression |
>>> | test machine | 48 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz (Ivy Bridge-EP) with 112G memory |
>>> | test parameters | cpufreq_governor=performance |
>>> | | test=all |
>>> | | testtime=5s |
>>> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>
>>>
>>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202309081306.3ecb3734-oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Hi, several weeks ago we requested that these tests be run
>> again by the robot because they can't be run in environments
>> I have available to me (the tests do not run on Fedora, and
>> I don't have any big iron).
>>
>> We wanted the tests rerun before the patch was committed.
>> There was a deafening silence. So I assumed the work I did
>> then to address the regression was successful, and the
>> patches are now in upstream Linux.
>>
>> This new report is disappointing.
>
> I'm so sorry that I missed the test request for
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/169030957098.157536.9938425508695693348.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> just FYI, when this auto-bisect done,
> head commit of linus/master: [65d6e954e37872fd9afb5ef3fc0481bb3c2f20f4] was
> tested, it already includes
> 2be4f05af71bb libfs: Remove parent dentry locking in offset_iterate_dir()
>
> in our tests, the regression still exists.
Thanks for clarifying. I wondered about that, of course only just
after clicking "Send".
>> But, I'm still in a position where I can't run this test,
>> and the results don't really indicate where the problem
>> is. So I can't possibly address this issue.
>>
>> Any suggestions, advice, or help would be appreciated.
>
> if you have further fix patch, could you let us know? I will test it.
Well that's the problem. Since I can't run the reproducer, there's
nothing I can do to troubleshoot the problem myself.
Is there any hope in getting this reproducer to run on Fedora?
--
Chuck Lever
