On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:05:04 +0000
SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Also, this if statement is only done when the trace event is enabled, so
> > it's equivalent to:
> >
> > if (trace_damos_before_apply_enabled()) {
> > if (sdx >= 0)
> > trace_damos_before_apply(cidx, sidx, tidx, r,
> > damon_nr_regions(t));
> > }
>
> Again, thank you very much for letting me know this awesome feature. However,
> sidx is supposed to be always >=0 here, since kdamond is running in single
> thread and hence no race is expected. If it exists, it's a bug. So, I
> wouldn't make this change. Appreciate again for letting me know this very
> useful feature, and please let me know if I'm missing something, though!
The race isn't with your code, but the enabling of tracing.
Let's say you enable tracing just ass it passed the first:
if (trace_damos_before_apply_enabled()) {
damon_for_each_scheme(siter, c) {
if (siter == s)
break;
sidx++;
}
damon_for_each_target(titer, c) {
if (titer == t)
break;
tidx++;
}
Now, sidx and tidx is zero (when they were not computed, thus, they
shouldn't be zero.
Then tracing is fully enabled here, and now we enter:
if (trace_damos_before_apply_enabled()) {
trace_damos_before_apply(cidx, sidx, tidx, r,
damon_nr_regions(t));
}
Now the trace event is hit with sidx and tidx zero when they should not be.
This could confuse you when looking at the report.
What I suggested was to initialize sidx to zero, set it in the first
trace_*_enabled() check, and ignore calling the tracepoint if it's not >= 0.
-- Steve
