Re: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma->vm_policy linkages"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(5/30/12 3:17 PM), Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2012, kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

From: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 05f144a0d5 removed vma->vm_policy updates code and it is a purpose of
mbind_range(). Now, mbind_range() is virtually no-op. no-op function don't
makes any bugs, I agree. but maybe it is not right fix.

I dont really understand the changelog. But to restore the policy_vma() is
the right thing to do since there are potential multiple use cases where
we want to apply a policy to a vma.

Proposed new changelog:

Commit 05f144a0d5 folded policy_vma() into mbind_range(). There are
other use cases of policy_vma(*) though and so revert a piece of
that commit in order to have a policy_vma() function again.

sorry, I overlooked this. Commit 05f144a0d5 don't work neither regular vma
nor shmem vma. thus I can't take this proposal. sorry.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]