Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/compaction: improve comment of is_via_compact_memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/26/2023 11:36 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
We do proactive compaction with order == -1 via
1. /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
2. /sys/devices/system/node/nodex/compact
3. /proc/sys/vm/compaction_proactiveness
Add missed situation in which order == -1.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
  mm/compaction.c | 6 ++++--
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 89a1b627bc89..00b7bba6c72e 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -2061,8 +2061,10 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
  }
/*
- * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
- * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
+ * order == -1 is expected when compacting proactively via
+ * 1. /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
+ * 2. /sys/devices/system/node/nodex/compact
+ * 3. /proc/sys/vm/compaction_proactiveness
   */
  static inline bool is_via_compact_memory(int order)
  {




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux