On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 10:54:03AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 06:16:42AM +0000, Maximilian Heyne wrote:
> > From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > [ upstream commit 5ef64cc8987a9211d3f3667331ba3411a94ddc79 ]
> >
> > Commit 2a9127fcf229 ("mm: rewrite wait_on_page_bit_common() logic") made
> > the page locking entirely fair, in that if a waiter came in while the
> > lock was held, the lock would be transferred to the lockers strictly in
> > order.
> >
> > That was intended to finally get rid of the long-reported watchdog
> > failures that involved the page lock under extreme load, where a process
> > could end up waiting essentially forever, as other page lockers stole
> > the lock from under it.
> >
> > It also improved some benchmarks, but it ended up causing huge
> > performance regressions on others, simply because fair lock behavior
> > doesn't end up giving out the lock as aggressively, causing better
> > worst-case latency, but potentially much worse average latencies and
> > throughput.
> >
> > Instead of reverting that change entirely, this introduces a controlled
> > amount of unfairness, with a sysctl knob to tune it if somebody needs
> > to. But the default value should hopefully be good for any normal load,
> > allowing a few rounds of lock stealing, but enforcing the strict
> > ordering before the lock has been stolen too many times.
> >
> > There is also a hint from Matthieu Baerts that the fair page coloring
> > may end up exposing an ABBA deadlock that is hidden by the usual
> > optimistic lock stealing, and while the unfairness doesn't fix the
> > fundamental issue (and I'm still looking at that), it avoids it in
> > practice.
> >
> > The amount of unfairness can be modified by writing a new value to the
> > 'sysctl_page_lock_unfairness' variable (default value of 5, exposed
> > through /proc/sys/vm/page_lock_unfairness), but that is hopefully
> > something we'd use mainly for debugging rather than being necessary for
> > any deep system tuning.
> >
> > This whole issue has exposed just how critical the page lock can be, and
> > how contended it gets under certain locks. And the main contention
> > doesn't really seem to be anything related to IO (which was the origin
> > of this lock), but for things like just verifying that the page file
> > mapping is stable while faulting in the page into a page table.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/ed8442fd-6f54-dd84-cd4a-941e8b7ee603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Link: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux-50-59&num=1
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/c560a38d-8313-51fb-b1ec-e904bd8836bc@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Michael Larabel <Michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.4
> > [ mheyne: fixed contextual conflict in mm/filemap.c due to missing
> > commit c7510ab2cf5c ("mm: abstract out wake_page_match() from
> > wake_page_function()"). Added WQ_FLAG_CUSTOM due to missing commit
> > 7f26482a872c ("locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem") ]
> > Signed-off-by: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/mm.h | 2 +
> > include/linux/wait.h | 2 +
> > kernel/sysctl.c | 8 +++
> > mm/filemap.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> This was also backported here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821222547.483583-1-saeed.mirzamohammadi@xxxxxxxxxx
> before yours.
>
> I took that one, can you verify that it is identical to yours and works
> properly as well?
Yes it's identical and fixes the performance regression seen. Therefore,
Tested-by: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@xxxxxxxxx>
for the other patch.
Thanks,
Max
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
