Re: [PATCH v3] mm: vmscan: try to reclaim swapcache pages if no swap space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Liu Shixin <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2023/8/28 9:51, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Liu Shixin <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> When spaces of swap devices are exhausted, only file pages can be reclaimed.
>>> But there are still some swapcache pages in anon lru list. This can lead
>>> to a premature out-of-memory.
>>>
>>> This problem can be fixed by checking number of swapcache pages in
>>> can_reclaim_anon_pages().
>>>
>>> Add a new bit swapcache_only in struct scan_control to skip isolating anon
>>> pages that are not in the swap cache when only swap cache can be reclaimed.
>> Better to describe how you test the patch and test results.
> OK, I will add the infomation.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/swap.h |  6 ++++++
>>>  mm/memcontrol.c      |  8 ++++++++
>>>  mm/vmscan.c          | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
>>> index 456546443f1f..0318e918bfa4 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
>>> @@ -669,6 +669,7 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(swp_entry_t entry, unsigned int nr_p
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  extern long mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>>> +extern long mem_cgroup_get_nr_swapcache_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>>>  extern bool mem_cgroup_swap_full(struct folio *folio);
>>>  #else
>>>  static inline void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
>>> @@ -691,6 +692,11 @@ static inline long mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>>>  	return get_nr_swap_pages();
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static inline long mem_cgroup_get_nr_swapcache_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>>> +{
>>> +	return total_swapcache_pages();
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static inline bool mem_cgroup_swap_full(struct folio *folio)
>>>  {
>>>  	return vm_swap_full();
>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> index e8ca4bdcb03c..c465829db92b 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> @@ -7567,6 +7567,14 @@ long mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>>>  	return nr_swap_pages;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +long mem_cgroup_get_nr_swapcache_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
>>> +		return total_swapcache_pages();
>>> +
>>> +	return memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SWAPCACHE);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  bool mem_cgroup_swap_full(struct folio *folio)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> index 7c33c5b653ef..5cb4adf6642b 100644
>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ struct scan_control {
>>>  	/* Always discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory */
>>>  	unsigned int no_demotion:1;
>>>  
>>> +	/* Swap space is exhausted, only reclaim swapcache for anon LRU */
>>> +	unsigned int swapcache_only:1;
>>> +
>>>  	/* Allocation order */
>>>  	s8 order;
>>>  
>>> @@ -613,10 +616,20 @@ static inline bool can_reclaim_anon_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>>>  		 */
>>>  		if (get_nr_swap_pages() > 0)
>>>  			return true;
>>> +		/* Is there any swapcache pages to reclaim? */
>>> +		if (total_swapcache_pages() > 0) {
>>> +			sc->swapcache_only = 1;
>>> +			return true;
>>> +		}
>>>  	} else {
>>>  		/* Is the memcg below its swap limit? */
>>>  		if (mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(memcg) > 0)
>>>  			return true;
>>> +		/* Is there any swapcache pages in memcg to reclaim? */
>>> +		if (mem_cgroup_get_nr_swapcache_pages(memcg) > 0) {
>>> +			sc->swapcache_only = 1;
>>> +			return true;
>>> +		}
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>>  	/*
>>> @@ -2280,6 +2293,19 @@ static bool skip_cma(struct folio *folio, struct scan_control *sc)
>>>  }
>>>  #endif
>>>  
>>> +static bool skip_isolate(struct folio *folio, struct scan_control *sc,
>>> +			 enum lru_list lru)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (folio_zonenum(folio) > sc->reclaim_idx)
>>> +		return true;
>>> +	if (skip_cma(folio, sc))
>>> +		return true;
>>> +	if (unlikely(sc->swapcache_only && !is_file_lru(lru) &&
>>> +	    !folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
>> Just
>>
>> 	if (unlikely(sc->swapcache_only && !folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
>>
>> is enough.
> That would results the file pages to be skipped too, but what expected is to skip non-swapcache
> pages in anon lru list. So I think the condition !is_file_lru(lru) is required.

Ah, you are right.

--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

>>
>>> +		return true;
>>> +	return false;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  /*
>>>   * Isolating page from the lruvec to fill in @dst list by nr_to_scan times.
>>>   *
>>> @@ -2326,8 +2352,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>>>  		nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>>>  		total_scan += nr_pages;
>>>  
>>> -		if (folio_zonenum(folio) > sc->reclaim_idx ||
>>> -				skip_cma(folio, sc)) {
>>> +		if (skip_isolate(folio, sc, lru)) {
>>>  			nr_skipped[folio_zonenum(folio)] += nr_pages;
>>>  			move_to = &folios_skipped;
>>>  			goto move;




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux