slab/for-next: 102 Tests: 102 Passed, 0 Failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, this is the test result of slab/for-next testing,
targeting the testing of various SLUB configurations.

# Test Result

slab/for-next: 102 Tests: 102 Passed, 0 Failed
git repository:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/slab.git/
git branch: for-next
git commit: 66489e5487b7 ("Merge branch 'slab/for-6.6/random_kmalloc'
into slab/for-next")

This is Hyeonggon's project aimed at helping to reduce kernel bugs
during the development stage. Feel free to share any opinions; I will
make adjustments accordingly next time.

# Additional Information

At the moment the test case is only a boot test.
The configuration matrix is as follows:

# Note: SLAB is not tested
PREEMPT=PREEMPT_NONE,PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY,PREEMPT
DEBUG=e,d # enables KASAN, lockdep, DEBUG_VM*
SLUB_HARDENING=e,d # enables SLUB_FREELIST_*
SLUB_DEBUG_ON=e,d
SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT=e,d
SLUB_TINY=e,d
SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL=e,d

and the combination filter is:
!((SLUB_TINY == "e") && (SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT == "d" || SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
== "e" || SLUB_HARDENING == "e" || SLUB_DEBUG_ON == "e"))




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux