On 8/22/23 04:20, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Eliminate a use of page->mapping by using vmalloc_to_folio() instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 5 +++++
> kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 840bae5f23b6..7d84a2843193 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1134,6 +1134,11 @@ int region_intersects(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, unsigned long flags,
> struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *addr);
> unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *addr);
>
> +static inline struct folio *vmalloc_to_folio(const void *addr)
> +{
> + return page_folio(vmalloc_to_page(addr));
I am wondering whether we should check the return value of vmalloc_to_page()?
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Determine if an address is within the vmalloc range
> *
> diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> index c73add132618..56939dc3bf33 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -873,9 +873,9 @@ __perf_mmap_to_page(struct perf_buffer *rb, unsigned long pgoff)
>
> static void perf_mmap_unmark_page(void *addr)
> {
> - struct page *page = vmalloc_to_page(addr);
> + struct folio *folio = vmalloc_to_folio(addr);
>
> - page->mapping = NULL;
> + folio->mapping = NULL;
> }
>
> static void rb_free_work(struct work_struct *work)
