On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 3:43 PM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 1:50 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 12:01 PM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > In eviction recency check, we are currently not holding a local > > > reference to the memcg that the refaulted folio belonged to when it was > > > evicted. This could cause serious memcg lifetime issues, for e.g in the > > > memcg hierarchy traversal done in mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(). This > > > has occurred in production: > > > > > > [ 155757.793456] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c0 > > > [ 155757.807568] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode > > > [ 155757.818024] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page > > > [ 155757.828482] PGD 401f77067 P4D 401f77067 PUD 401f76067 PMD 0 > > > [ 155757.839985] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP > > > [ 155757.846444] CPU: 7 PID: 1380944 Comm: ThriftSrv-pri3- Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S 6.4.3-0_fbk1_rc0_594_g8d0cbcaa67ba #1 > > > [ 155757.870808] Hardware name: Wiwynn Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS YMM16 05/24/2021 > > > [ 155757.887870] RIP: 0010:mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages+0x3d/0xb0 > > > [ 155757.899377] Code: 29 19 4a 02 48 39 f9 74 63 48 8b 97 c0 00 00 00 48 8b b7 58 02 00 00 48 2b b7 c0 01 00 00 48 39 f0 48 0f 4d c6 48 39 d1 74 42 <48> 8b b2 c0 00 00 00 48 8b ba 58 02 00 00 48 2b ba c0 01 00 00 48 > > > [ 155757.937125] RSP: 0018:ffffc9002ecdfbc8 EFLAGS: 00010286 > > > [ 155757.947755] RAX: 00000000003a3b1c RBX: 000007ffffffffff RCX: ffff888280183000 > > > [ 155757.962202] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0007ffffffffffff RDI: ffff888bbc2d1000 > > > [ 155757.976648] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 000000000000000b R09: ffff888ad9cedba0 > > > [ 155757.991094] R10: ffffea0039c07900 R11: 0000000000000010 R12: ffff888b23a7b000 > > > [ 155758.005540] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff888bbc2d1000 R15: 000007ffffc71354 > > > [ 155758.019991] FS: 00007f6234c68640(0000) GS:ffff88903f9c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > [ 155758.036356] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > > [ 155758.048023] CR2: 00000000000000c0 CR3: 0000000a83eb8004 CR4: 00000000007706e0 > > > [ 155758.062473] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > > [ 155758.076924] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > > [ 155758.091376] PKRU: 55555554 > > > [ 155758.096957] Call Trace: > > > [ 155758.102016] <TASK> > > > [ 155758.106502] ? __die+0x78/0xc0 > > > [ 155758.112793] ? page_fault_oops+0x286/0x380 > > > [ 155758.121175] ? exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110 > > > [ 155758.129209] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 > > > [ 155758.137763] ? mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages+0x3d/0xb0 > > > [ 155758.148060] workingset_test_recent+0xda/0x1b0 > > > [ 155758.157133] workingset_refault+0xca/0x1e0 > > > [ 155758.165508] filemap_add_folio+0x4d/0x70 > > > [ 155758.173538] page_cache_ra_unbounded+0xed/0x190 > > > [ 155758.182919] page_cache_sync_ra+0xd6/0x1e0 > > > [ 155758.191738] filemap_read+0x68d/0xdf0 > > > [ 155758.199495] ? mlx5e_napi_poll+0x123/0x940 > > > [ 155758.207981] ? __napi_schedule+0x55/0x90 > > > [ 155758.216095] __x64_sys_pread64+0x1d6/0x2c0 > > > [ 155758.224601] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x80 > > > [ 155758.232058] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 > > > [ 155758.242473] RIP: 0033:0x7f62c29153b5 > > > [ 155758.249938] Code: e8 48 89 75 f0 89 7d f8 48 89 4d e0 e8 b4 e6 f7 ff 41 89 c0 4c 8b 55 e0 48 8b 55 e8 48 8b 75 f0 8b 7d f8 b8 11 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 33 44 89 c7 48 89 45 f8 e8 e7 e6 f7 ff 48 8b > > > [ 155758.288005] RSP: 002b:00007f6234c5ffd0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000011 > > > [ 155758.303474] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f628c4e70c0 RCX: 00007f62c29153b5 > > > [ 155758.318075] RDX: 000000000003c041 RSI: 00007f61d2986000 RDI: 0000000000000076 > > > [ 155758.332678] RBP: 00007f6234c5fff0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000064d5230c > > > [ 155758.347452] R10: 000000000027d450 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 000000000003c041 > > > [ 155758.362044] R13: 00007f61d2986000 R14: 00007f629e11b060 R15: 000000000027d450 > > > [ 155758.376661] </TASK> > > > > > > This patch fixes the issue by getting a local reference inside > > > unpack_shadow(). > > > > > > Fixes: f78dfc7b77d5 ("workingset: fix confusion around eviction vs refault container") > > > > Beyond mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(), we still use the eviction_memcg > > without grabbing a ref to it first in workingset_test_recent() (and in > > workingset_refault() before that) as well as lru_gen_test_recent(). > > > > Wouldn't the fix go back even further? or am I misinterpreting the problem? > Hmm I don't see eviction_memcg being used outside of *_test_recent > (the rest just uses memcg = folio_memcg(folio), which if I'm not mistaken is > the memcg that is refaulting the folio into memory). > > Inside workingset_test_recent(), the only other place where eviction_memcg > is used is for mem_cgroup_lruvec. This function call won't crash whether > eviction_memcg is valid or not. If eviction_memcg is invalid because the memory was already freed, we are basically dereferencing garbage in mem_cgroup_lruvec() aren't we? > The crash only happens during > mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages, which has an upward traversal from > eviction_memcg to root. > > Let me know if this does not make sense and/or is insufficient to ensure > safe upward traversal from eviction_memcg to root! > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > --- > > > mm/workingset.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c > > > index da58a26d0d4d..03cadad4e484 100644 > > > --- a/mm/workingset.c > > > +++ b/mm/workingset.c > > > @@ -206,10 +206,19 @@ static void *pack_shadow(int memcgid, pg_data_t *pgdat, unsigned long eviction, > > > return xa_mk_value(eviction); > > > } > > > > > > -static void unpack_shadow(void *shadow, int *memcgidp, pg_data_t **pgdat, > > > - unsigned long *evictionp, bool *workingsetp) > > > +/* > > > + * Unpacks the stored fields of a shadow entry into the given pointers. > > > + * > > > + * The memcg pointer is only populated if the memcg recorded in the shadow > > > + * entry is valid. In this case, a reference to the memcg will be acquired, > > > + * and a corresponding mem_cgroup_put() will be needed when we no longer > > > + * need the memcg. > > > + */ > > > +static void unpack_shadow(void *shadow, struct mem_cgroup **memcgp, > > > + pg_data_t **pgdat, unsigned long *evictionp, bool *workingsetp) > > > { > > > unsigned long entry = xa_to_value(shadow); > > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg; > > > int memcgid, nid; > > > bool workingset; > > > > > > @@ -220,7 +229,24 @@ static void unpack_shadow(void *shadow, int *memcgidp, pg_data_t **pgdat, > > > memcgid = entry & ((1UL << MEM_CGROUP_ID_SHIFT) - 1); > > > entry >>= MEM_CGROUP_ID_SHIFT; > > > > > > - *memcgidp = memcgid; > > > + /* > > > + * Look up the memcg associated with the stored ID. It might > > > + * have been deleted since the folio's eviction. > > > + * > > > + * Note that in rare events the ID could have been recycled > > > + * for a new cgroup that refaults a shared folio. This is > > > + * impossible to tell from the available data. However, this > > > + * should be a rare and limited disturbance, and activations > > > + * are always speculative anyway. Ultimately, it's the aging > > > + * algorithm's job to shake out the minimum access frequency > > > + * for the active cache. > > > + */ > > > + memcg = mem_cgroup_from_id(memcgid); > > > + if (memcg && css_tryget(&memcg->css)) > > > + *memcgp = memcg; > > > + else > > > + *memcgp = NULL; > > > + > > > *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid); > > > *evictionp = entry; > > > *workingsetp = workingset; > > > @@ -262,15 +288,16 @@ static void *lru_gen_eviction(struct folio *folio) > > > static bool lru_gen_test_recent(void *shadow, bool file, struct lruvec **lruvec, > > > unsigned long *token, bool *workingset) > > > { > > > - int memcg_id; > > > unsigned long min_seq; > > > struct mem_cgroup *memcg; > > > struct pglist_data *pgdat; > > > > > > - unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcg_id, &pgdat, token, workingset); > > > + unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcg, &pgdat, token, workingset); > > > + if (!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !memcg) > > > + return false; > > > > +Yu Zhao > > > > There is a change of behavior here, right? > > > > The existing code will continue if !mem_cgroup_disabled() && !memcg is > > true, and mem_cgroup_lruvec() will return the lruvec of the root > > memcg. Now we are just returning false. > > > > Is this intentional? > Oh right, there is. Should have cc-ed Yu Zhao as well, my bad. > get_maintainers.pl isn't always sufficient I guess :) > > But yeah, this behavioral change is intentional. > > Correct me if I'm wrong of course, but it seems like MGLRU should > follow the same pattern here. That is, once we return from unpack_shadow, > the possible scenarios are the same as prescribed in workingset_test_recent: > > 1. If mem_cgroup is disabled, we can ignore this check. > 2. If mem_cgroup is enabled, then the only reason why we get NULL > memcg from unpack_shadow is if the eviction_memcg is no longer > valid. We should not try to get its lruvec, or substitute it with the > root memcg, but return false right away (i.e not recent). > > I will leave this for Yu :)