On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:30 AM Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> First found this typo as reviewing memory tier code. Fix it by sed like:
> $ sed -i 's/sibiling/sibling/g' $(git grep -l sibiling)
>
> so the acpi one will be corrected as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Please post the ACPI and mm changes as separate patches.
Thanks!
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 2 +-
> mm/memory-tiers.c | 10 +++++-----
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> index 7a453c5ff303..7f073ca64f0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void round_robin_cpu(unsigned int tsk_index)
> for_each_cpu(cpu, pad_busy_cpus)
> cpumask_or(tmp, tmp, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
> cpumask_andnot(tmp, cpu_online_mask, tmp);
> - /* avoid HT sibilings if possible */
> + /* avoid HT siblings if possible */
> if (cpumask_empty(tmp))
> cpumask_andnot(tmp, cpu_online_mask, pad_busy_cpus);
> if (cpumask_empty(tmp)) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> index fc9647b1b4f9..1e6c8ddcaa92 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> struct memory_tier;
> struct memory_dev_type {
> /* list of memory types that are part of same tier as this type */
> - struct list_head tier_sibiling;
> + struct list_head tier_sibling;
> /* abstract distance for this specific memory type */
> int adistance;
> /* Nodes of same abstract distance */
> diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> index a516e303e304..56c22470c96d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static __always_inline nodemask_t get_memtier_nodemask(struct memory_tier *memti
> nodemask_t nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
> struct memory_dev_type *memtype;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(memtype, &memtier->memory_types, tier_sibiling)
> + list_for_each_entry(memtype, &memtier->memory_types, tier_sibling)
> nodes_or(nodes, nodes, memtype->nodes);
>
> return nodes;
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static struct memory_tier *find_create_memory_tier(struct memory_dev_type *memty
> * If the memtype is already part of a memory tier,
> * just return that.
> */
> - if (!list_empty(&memtype->tier_sibiling)) {
> + if (!list_empty(&memtype->tier_sibling)) {
> list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
> if (adistance == memtier->adistance_start)
> return memtier;
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static struct memory_tier *find_create_memory_tier(struct memory_dev_type *memty
> memtier = new_memtier;
>
> link_memtype:
> - list_add(&memtype->tier_sibiling, &memtier->memory_types);
> + list_add(&memtype->tier_sibling, &memtier->memory_types);
> return memtier;
> }
>
> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static bool clear_node_memory_tier(int node)
> memtype = node_memory_types[node].memtype;
> node_clear(node, memtype->nodes);
> if (nodes_empty(memtype->nodes)) {
> - list_del_init(&memtype->tier_sibiling);
> + list_del_init(&memtype->tier_sibling);
> if (list_empty(&memtier->memory_types))
> destroy_memory_tier(memtier);
> }
> @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ struct memory_dev_type *alloc_memory_type(int adistance)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> memtype->adistance = adistance;
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memtype->tier_sibiling);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memtype->tier_sibling);
> memtype->nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
> kref_init(&memtype->kref);
> return memtype;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
