On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 03:13:25PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 1:04 AM Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Nick, > > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 12:46:00PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 12:02 PM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > > > head: 02aee814d37c563e24b73bcd0f9cb608fbd403d4 > > > > commit: f9b3cd24578401e7a392974b3353277286e49cee Kconfig.debug: make DEBUG_INFO selectable from a choice > > > > date: 1 year, 5 months ago > > > > config: riscv-randconfig-r001-20230808 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230809/202308090204.9yZffBWo-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > > > > compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1) > > > > > > FWIW, I wasn't able to reproduce with the provided config and > > > clang-17. Perhaps this is a bug for older clang releases (the bot > > > tested with clang-14). > > > > Thanks for this info. We re-tested with various versions of clang. > > clang-14 throws this error, while clang-15/16/17 have no problem in this > > Oh, interesting data point. > > Ok, I've filed https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1914 to > track this. > > Will bisect llvm to find when this was fixed. > > Then we will fix kconfig for the split debug info. > > > case. We will consider adjusting our compiler coverage and remove the old > > clang-14. > > Documentation/process/changes.rst lists our minimal support for > clang-11+. It's still useful to have clang-14 builds. Got it, we will keep clang-14 running, and ignore this specific error. > > > > > Best Regards, > > Yujie > > > > > > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230809/202308090204.9yZffBWo-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308090204.9yZffBWo-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > >> error: A dwo section may not contain relocations > > > > fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=] > > > > 20 errors generated. > > > > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:288: arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.o] Error 1 shuffle=3686795728 > > > > make[2]: Target 'include/generated/vdso-offsets.h' not remade because of errors. > > > > make[1]: *** [arch/riscv/Makefile:120: vdso_prepare] Error 2 shuffle=3686795728 > > > > make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors. > > > > make: *** [Makefile:219: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=3686795728 > > > > make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > > > > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > ~Nick Desaulniers > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers >
