On 05/29/2012 09:25 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
I will try to at least have the page accounting done in a consistent way. How
> about that?
Ok. What do you mean by "consistent"? Since objects and pages can be used
in a shared way and since accounting in many areas of the kernel is
intentional fuzzy to avoid performance issues there is not that much of a
requirement for accuracy. We have problems even just defining what the
exact set of pages belonging to a task/process is.
I mean consistent between allocators, done in a shared place.
Note that what we do here *is* still fuzzy to some degree. We can have a
level of sharing, and always account to the first one to touch, we don't
go worrying about this because that would be hell. We also don't
carry a process' objects around when we send it to a different cgroup.
Those are all already simplications for performance and simplicity sake.
But we really need a page to be filled with objects from the same
cgroup, and the non-shared objects to be accounted to the right place.
Otherwise, I don't think we can meet even the lighter of isolation
guarantees.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>