On 8/9/2023 5:49 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
Parameter pgdat is not used in fragmentation_score_wmark. Just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/compaction.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index ea61922a1619..38c8d216c6a3 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -2142,7 +2142,7 @@ static unsigned int fragmentation_score_node(pg_data_t *pgdat)
return score;
}
-static unsigned int fragmentation_score_wmark(pg_data_t *pgdat, bool low)
+static unsigned int fragmentation_score_wmark(bool low)
{
unsigned int wmark_low;
@@ -2162,7 +2162,7 @@ static bool should_proactive_compact_node(pg_data_t *pgdat)
if (!sysctl_compaction_proactiveness || kswapd_is_running(pgdat))
return false;
- wmark_high = fragmentation_score_wmark(pgdat, false);
+ wmark_high = fragmentation_score_wmark(false);
return fragmentation_score_node(pgdat) > wmark_high;
}
@@ -2201,7 +2201,7 @@ static enum compact_result __compact_finished(struct compact_control *cc)
return COMPACT_PARTIAL_SKIPPED;
score = fragmentation_score_zone(cc->zone);
- wmark_low = fragmentation_score_wmark(pgdat, true);
+ wmark_low = fragmentation_score_wmark(true);
if (score > wmark_low)
ret = COMPACT_CONTINUE;