Re: [akpm-mm:mm-stable 219/240] mm/memory.c:5410:41: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_is_tcp'; did you mean 'vma_is_dax'?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 16:17:21 +0800 kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-stable
> head:   5fb2ea3111f4ecc6dc4891ce5b00f0217aae9a04
> commit: 4aaa60dad4d1c96151dec51098aed866bb6e867d [219/240] mm: allow per-VMA locks on file-backed VMAs
> config: x86_64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230813/202308131610.jF4ncWp6-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230813/202308131610.jF4ncWp6-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308131610.jF4ncWp6-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/container_of.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/list.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/smp.h:12,
>                     from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:5,
>                     from mm/memory.c:42:
>    mm/memory.c: In function 'lock_vma_under_rcu':
> >> mm/memory.c:5410:41: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_is_tcp'; did you mean 'vma_is_dax'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     5410 |         if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma && !vma_is_tcp(vma)))
>          |                                         ^~~~~~~~~~
>    include/linux/compiler.h:77:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
>       77 | # define unlikely(x)    __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>          |                                             ^
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 

This later gets accidentally fixed by Suren's "mm: handle userfaults
under VMA lock".

If Matthew can suggest a fix for this I can queue it close to "mm:
allow per-VMA locks on file-backed VMAs" to minimize the size of the
bisection hole?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux