On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:35:01AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 08.08.23 19:09, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Sid was incautious enough to say he'd like to take on fixing > > walk_page_range() so that hugetlb isn't treated specially. This is > > going to subject him to one of my rants, so I thought I'd share with > > everyone before we meet to talk about it later today. > > Are we only talking about walk_page_range() or also walk_page_range_vma() / > walk_page_vma() ? > > I tend to like the VMA variants ... We're talking about getting rid of mm_walk_ops. There aren't exactly a lot of callers of either of those functions -- 4 of walk_page_vma() and 1 of walk_page_range_vma().
