On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:37:40PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 09:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I tried cherry-picking this on top of 3.2.17, but there was a conflict > > in unmap_ref_private(). It looks like all of these belong in 3.2.y as > > well: > > > > 1e16a53 mm/hugetlb.c: fix virtual address handling in hugetlb fault > > 0c176d5 mm: hugetlb: fix pgoff computation when unmapping page from vma > > ea5768c mm/hugetlb.c: avoid bogus counter of surplus huge page > > 409eb8c mm/hugetlb.c: undo change to page mapcount in fault handler > > cd2934a flush_tlb_range() needs ->page_table_lock when ->mmap_sem is not held > > Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. I'm asking for confirmation: should > these all be applied to 3.2.y? I think yes, probably, but I'm not enough of an expert on the hugetlbfs code to say for sure. David Gibson is on leave at the moment and so may not be in a position to reply. Perhaps one of hugetlbfs experts on cc could reply? Paul. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>