On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:26:12PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >> On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 9:08 AM Minchan Kim wrote: >> > Hmm, VM_DMA would become generic flag? >> > AFAIU, maybe VM_DMA would be used only on ARM arch. >> >> Right now yes, it will be used only on ARM architecture, but maybe other architecture will >> start using it once it is available. >> > There's very little about the code in question that is ARM-specific to > begin with. I plan to adopt similar changes on SH once the work has > settled one way or the other, so we'll probably use the VMA flag there, > too. I don't think VM_DMA is good idea because x86_64 has two dma zones. x86 unaware patches make no sense. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>