On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 11:53:02PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (23/08/07 16:31), Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > I am sorry but I will not accept this patch unless there > > is a wide consensus that this makes sense. > > I completely agree with Petr. > > I found it a little bit hard to be enthusiastic about > this patch in particular and _probably_ about this series > in general, sorry Andy. What to do with _headers_ that include kernel.h for no reason other than sprintf.h (as an example)? Your suggestion, please? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
