On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 05:32:30PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote: > The patch in its current form, I am afraid, is very very hard to review. > It is way too big and is missing comments. Having CONFIG_MIGRC makes no > sense (I guess it is intended to be a “chicken-bit”). Variable and > function names are not informative. The memory barriers are handle > improperly (please check again the smp_mb__after_atomic() rules). I checked it. I found what I was wrong at. Thank you for pointing it out. I will fix it from the next spin. Byungchul
