On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:07:52 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 03:55:47PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > @@ -1761,6 +1761,11 @@ static int parse_pred(const char *str, void *data,
> > > FILTER_PRED_FN_CPUMASK;
> > > } else if (field->filter_type == FILTER_CPU) {
> > > pred->fn_num = FILTER_PRED_FN_CPU_CPUMASK;
> > > + } else if (single) {
> > > + pred->op = pred->op == OP_BAND ? OP_EQ : pred->op;
> >
> > Nit, the above can be written as:
> >
> > pred->op = pret->op != OP_BAND ? : OP_EQ;
> >
>
> Heh. Those are not equivalent. The right way to write this is:
You mean because of my typo?
>
> if (pred->op == OP_BAND)
> pred->op = OP_EQ;
But sure, I'm fine with that, and it's probably more readable too.
-- Steve
