On 7/21/2023 11:09 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
If no preferred one was not found, we will use candidate page with maximum
pfn > min_pfn which is saved in high_pfn. Correct "minimum" to "maximum
candidate" in comment.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Yes, the 'minimum' can be confused. At least to me, it looks good.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index eb1d3d9a422c..c0d8d08fc163 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ static void fast_isolate_freepages(struct compact_control *cc)
break;
}
- /* Use a minimum pfn if a preferred one was not found */
+ /* Use a maximum candidate pfn if a preferred one was not found */
if (!page && high_pfn) {
page = pfn_to_page(high_pfn);
