Re: [PATCH] mm/mprotect: fix obsolete function name in change_pte_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23.07.23 05:31, Miaohe Lin wrote:
Since commit 79a1971c5f14 ("mm: move the copy_one_pte() pte_present check
into the caller"), the explanation of preserving soft-dirtiness is moved
into copy_nonpresent_pte(). Update corresponding comment.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/mprotect.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 5c3112d92466..3f36c88a238e 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
  			} else if (is_writable_device_private_entry(entry)) {
  				/*
  				 * We do not preserve soft-dirtiness. See
-				 * copy_one_pte() for explanation.
+				 * copy_nonpresent_pte() for explanation.
  				 */
  				entry = make_readable_device_private_entry(
  							swp_offset(entry));

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux