On Tue, 22 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > I think that's precisely David's point: that we might want to destroy them > > eventually. > > Cannot imagine why. > We can't predict how slab will be extended in the future and this affects anything created before g_cpucache_cpu <= EARLY. This would introduce the first problem with destroying such caches and is unnecessary if a workaround exists. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>