Re: [PATCH v3] hugetlbfs: Fix integer overflow check in hugetlbfs_file_mmap()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:49:52PM +0800, Linke Li wrote:
> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> @@ -154,10 +154,7 @@ static int hugetlbfs_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  	if (vma->vm_pgoff & (~huge_page_mask(h) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	vma_len = (loff_t)(vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start);
> -	len = vma_len + ((loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	/* check for overflow */
> -	if (len < vma_len)
> +	if (check_add_overflow(vma_len, (loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT, &len))
>  		return -EINVAL;

Doesn't this check duplicate that performed by file_mmap_ok()?  Can't we
just delete the check, or is there a code path that leads here while
avoiding file_mmap_ok()?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux