Commit 45c7f7e1ef17 ("mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from
protection checks") changed the function name but not the corresponding
comment.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 058fb748e128..64014b656a0f 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -582,9 +582,9 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
/*
* There is no reclaim protection applied to a targeted reclaim.
* We are special casing this specific case here because
- * mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep
- * the protection invariant for calculated effective values for
- * parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
+ * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection calculation is not robust enough
+ * to keep the protection invariant for calculated effective values
+ * for parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
* especially a problem for tail memcgs (as they have pages on LRU)
* which would want to have effective values 0 for targeted reclaim
* but a different value for external reclaim.
--
2.33.0
