RE: [RFC v1 1/3] mm/mmu_notifier: Add a new notifier for mapping updates (new pages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jason,

> 
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 01:28:56AM -0700, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> > Currently, there does not appear to be any mechanism for letting
> > drivers or other kernel entities know about updates made in a
> > mapping particularly when a new page is faulted in. Providing
> > notifications for such situations is really useful when using
> > memfds backed by ram-based filesystems such as shmem or hugetlbfs
> > that also allow FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE.
> 
> Huh? You get an invalidate when this happens and the address becomes
> non-present.
Yes, we do get an invalidate (range) but it is not going to help given my
use-case. This is because the invalidate only indicates that the old pages
are gone (and not about the availability of new pages). IIUC, after a hole
gets punched, it appears the new pages are faulted in only when there
are writes made to that region where the hole was punched. So, I think
what would really help is to get notified when a new page becomes part
of the mapping at a given offset. 

> 
> > More specifically, when a hole is punched in a memfd (that is
> > backed by shmem or hugetlbfs), a driver can register for
> > notifications associated with range invalidations. However, it
> > would also be useful to have notifications when new pages are
> > faulted in as a result of writes made to the mapping region that
> > overlaps with a previously punched hole.
> 
> If there is no change to the PTEs then it is hard to see why this
> would be part of a mmu_notifier.
IIUC, the PTEs do get changed but only when a new page is faulted in.
For shmem, it looks like the PTEs are updated in handle_pte_fault()
after shmem_fault() gets called and for hugetlbfs, this seems to
happen in hugetlb_fault().

Instead of introducing a new notifier, I did think about reusing
(or overloading) .change_pte() but I did not fully understand the impact
it would have on KVM, the only user of .change_pte(). 

Thanks,
Vivek

> 
> Jason





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux