Hi Sanjaya, Can you please check if the attached patch fixes your issue? Thanks in advance, Ilan. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2023 14:11 > To: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric > Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Kirill A. Shutemov > <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Michael Ellerman > <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux > Regressions <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Memory Management List > <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>; Linux Networking <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux > Wireless <linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Fwd: mm/page_alloc.c:4453 with cfg80211_wiphy_work [cfg80211] > > Hi, > > I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it: > > > Linux version 6.5.0-rc1+ - up to > > 831fe284d8275987596b7d640518dddba5735f61 > > > > [ 7.312665] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 7.312671] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 659 at mm/page_alloc.c:4453 > __alloc_pages+0x329/0x340 > > [ 7.312683] Modules linked in: exfat ntfs3 bnep btusb btrtl btbcm btintel > btmtk bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc iwlmvm mac80211 libarc4 > snd_hda_codec_hdmi iwlwifi snd_hda_codec_realtek > snd_hda_codec_generic ledtrig_audio cfg80211 snd_hda_intel > snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep intel_rapl_msr x86_pkg_temp_thermal > intel_powerclamp snd_hda_core tpm_tis intel_rapl_common > snd_intel_dspcfg tpm_tis_core idma64 rfkill tpm_crb tpm rng_core > pkcs8_key_parser fuse dmi_sysfs > > [ 7.312725] CPU: 8 PID: 659 Comm: kworker/8:2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1 #1 > > [ 7.312729] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems > NUC12WSKi7/NUC12WSBi7, BIOS WSADL357.0087.2023.0306.1931 03/06/2023 > > [ 7.312731] Workqueue: events cfg80211_wiphy_work [cfg80211] > > [ 7.312785] RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x329/0x340 > > [ 7.312791] Code: a8 44 89 e6 89 df c6 45 c8 00 4c 89 6d b0 41 89 de e8 0b ef > ff ff 49 89 c7 e9 90 fe ff ff 80 e3 3f eb c0 c6 05 69 49 f7 09 01 <0f> 0b eb 98 e8 > 1e ec 6d 01 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f > > [ 7.312794] RSP: 0018:ffffad8e80defbf8 EFLAGS: 00010246 > > [ 7.312798] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000040dc0 RCX: > 0000000000000000 > > [ 7.312800] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: > 0000000000040dc0 > > [ 7.312802] RBP: ffffad8e80defc50 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: > 0000000000000018 > > [ 7.312804] R10: ffff938899d4a800 R11: ffff938891a9c800 R12: > 0000000000000034 > > [ 7.312806] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffffc02b150d R15: > fffffffffffffc90 > > [ 7.312808] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff938fb6600000(0000) > knlGS:0000000000000000 > > [ 7.312811] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > [ 7.312813] CR2: 00007f540c94b710 CR3: 000000059502c000 CR4: > 0000000000f50ea0 > > [ 7.312815] PKRU: 55555554 > > [ 7.312817] Call Trace: > > [ 7.312819] <TASK> > > [ 7.312822] ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 > > [ 7.312827] ? __warn+0x89/0x140 > > [ 7.312833] ? __alloc_pages+0x329/0x340 > > [ 7.312837] ? report_bug+0x15d/0x180 > > [ 7.312843] ? handle_bug+0x42/0x80 > > [ 7.312848] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70 > > [ 7.312852] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 > > [ 7.312857] ? cfg80211_scan_6ghz+0x12d/0xcb0 [cfg80211] > > [ 7.312911] ? __alloc_pages+0x329/0x340 > > [ 7.312916] ? cfg80211_scan_6ghz+0x12d/0xcb0 [cfg80211] > > [ 7.312968] __kmalloc_large_node+0x7e/0x170 > > [ 7.312973] __kmalloc+0xb9/0x120 > > [ 7.312976] cfg80211_scan_6ghz+0x12d/0xcb0 [cfg80211] > > [ 7.313028] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0xd/0x20 > > [ 7.313034] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x14/0x190 > > [ 7.313040] ? raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x12/0x20 > > [ 7.313046] ___cfg80211_scan_done+0x1e0/0x250 [cfg80211] > > [ 7.313099] __cfg80211_scan_done+0x23/0x30 [cfg80211] > > [ 7.313153] cfg80211_wiphy_work+0xae/0xd0 [cfg80211] > > [ 7.313201] process_one_work+0x1f1/0x3e0 > > [ 7.313204] worker_thread+0x51/0x3f0 > > [ 7.313207] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x26/0x30 > > [ 7.313212] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 > > [ 7.313217] kthread+0xdb/0x110 > > [ 7.313222] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > > [ 7.313226] ret_from_fork+0x3e/0x60 > > [ 7.313229] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > > [ 7.313233] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 > > [ 7.313237] </TASK> > > [ 7.313239] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > See Bugzilla for the full thread. > > Anyway, I'm adding it to regzbot to make sure it doesn't fall through cracks > unnoticed: > > #regzbot introduced: v6.5-rc1..831fe284d82759 > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217675 > > Thanks. > > [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217675 > > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
0001-wifi-cfg80211-Fix-return-value-in-scan-logic.patch
Description: 0001-wifi-cfg80211-Fix-return-value-in-scan-logic.patch
