On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 03:39:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +void *vmalloc_huge_node(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask, int node)
> +{
> + return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
> + gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL, VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP,
> + node, __builtin_return_address(0));
> +}
> +
> /**
> * vmalloc_huge - allocate virtually contiguous memory, allow huge pages
> * @size: allocation size
> @@ -3430,9 +3437,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc);
> */
> void *vmalloc_huge(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
> - gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL, VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP,
> - NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));
> + return vmalloc_huge_node(size, gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> }
Isn't this going to result in the "caller" being always recorded as
vmalloc_huge() instead of the caller of vmalloc_huge()?
