On 11.07.23 19:57, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 09:34:42PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: >>> >>>> I suppose I should ask you to try reverting this 0d1c81edc61e alone >>>> from 6.5-rc1: the consistency of your bisection implies that it will >>>> "fix" the issues, and it is a commit which we could drop. It makes >>>> me a little nervous, applying userspace-pagetable validation to kernel >>>> pagetables, so I don't want to drop it; and it would really be cargo- >>>> culting to drop it without understanding. But we could drop it. >>> >>> I did look at that, it doesn't revert cleanly by itself. ... >> >> Right, that ptep_get() wrapper on the next line came in on top. >> The patch to revert just 0d1c81edc61e is this: > > Still investigating but I'm pretty convinced this is nothing to do with > your commit/series and is just common or garden memory corruption that > just happens to get tickled by your changes. Sorry for the noise. In that case: #regzbot introduced v6.4..v6.5-rc1 #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
