Re: [PATCH 1/2] maple_tree: Fix 32 bit mas_next testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 7:39 PM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The test setup of mas_next is dependent on node entry size to create a 2
> level tree, but the tests did not account for this in the expected value
> when shifting beyond the scope of the tree.
>
> Fix this by setting up the test to succeed depending on the node
> entries which is dependent on the 32/64 bit setup.
>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAMuHMdV4T53fOw7VPoBgPR7fP6RYqf=CBhD_y_vOg53zZX_DnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

s/Link/Closes/

> Fixes: 120b116208a0 ("maple_tree: reorganize testing to restore module testing")
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>

On ARAnyM:

    TEST STARTING

    maple_tree: 3804524 of 3804524 tests passed

Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux