On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:30 AM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> [230712 11:15]: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 7:26 PM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Suren, > > > > > > When running kselftest mm, I believe I've come across a lockdep issue > > > with the per-vma locking pagefault: > > > > > > [ 226.105499] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1907 at include/linux/mmap_lock.h:71 handle_userfault+0x34d/0xff0 > > > [ 226.106517] Modules linked in: > > > [ 226.107060] CPU: 1 PID: 1907 Comm: uffd-unit-tests Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1+ #636 > > > [ 226.108099] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014 > > > [ 226.109626] RIP: 0010:handle_userfault+0x34d/0xff0 > > > [ 226.113056] Code: 00 48 85 c0 0f 85 d4 fe ff ff 4c 89 f7 e8 bb 58 ea ff 0f 0b 31 f6 49 8d be a0 01 00 00 e8 0b 8b 53 01 85 c0 0f 85 00 fe ff ff <0f> 0b e9 f9 fd ff ff 49 8d be a0 01 00 00 be ff ff ff ff e8 eb 8a > > > [ 226.115798] RSP: 0000:ffff888113a8fbf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 > > > [ 226.116570] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888113a8fdc8 RCX: 0000000000000001 > > > [ 226.117630] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff97a70220 RDI: ffffffff97c316e0 > > > [ 226.118654] RBP: ffff88811de7c1e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffed1022991400 > > > [ 226.119508] R10: ffff888114c8a003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000200 > > > [ 226.120471] R13: ffff88811de7c1f0 R14: ffff888106ebec00 R15: 0000000000001000 > > > [ 226.121521] FS: 00007f226ec0f740(0000) GS:ffff88836f280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > [ 226.122543] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > > [ 226.123242] CR2: 00007f226ac0f028 CR3: 00000001088a4001 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 > > > [ 226.124075] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > > [ 226.125073] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > > [ 226.126308] Call Trace: > > > [ 226.127473] <TASK> > > > [ 226.128001] ? __warn+0x9c/0x1f0 > > > [ 226.129005] ? handle_userfault+0x34d/0xff0 > > > [ 226.129940] ? report_bug+0x1f2/0x220 > > > [ 226.130700] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 > > > [ 226.131234] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x40 > > > [ 226.131827] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 > > > [ 226.132516] ? handle_userfault+0x34d/0xff0 > > > [ 226.133193] ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 > > > [ 226.133862] ? find_held_lock+0x83/0xa0 > > > [ 226.134602] ? do_anonymous_page+0x81f/0x870 > > > [ 226.135314] ? __pfx_handle_userfault+0x10/0x10 > > > [ 226.136226] ? __pte_offset_map_lock+0xd4/0x160 > > > [ 226.136958] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x92/0xf0 > > > [ 226.137547] ? preempt_count_sub+0xf/0xc0 > > > [ 226.138011] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40 > > > [ 226.138594] ? do_anonymous_page+0x81f/0x870 > > > [ 226.139239] __handle_mm_fault+0x40a/0x470 > > > [ 226.139749] ? __pfx___handle_mm_fault+0x10/0x10 > > > [ 226.140516] handle_mm_fault+0xe9/0x270 > > > [ 226.141015] do_user_addr_fault+0x1a9/0x810 > > > [ 226.141638] exc_page_fault+0x58/0xe0 > > > [ 226.142101] asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 > > > [ 226.142713] RIP: 0033:0x561107c4967e > > > [ 226.143391] Code: 48 89 85 18 ff ff ff e9 e2 00 00 00 48 8b 15 49 a0 00 00 48 8b 05 2a a0 00 00 48 0f af 45 f8 48 83 c0 2f 48 01 d0 48 83 e0 f8 <48> 8b 00 48 89 45 c8 48 8b 05 54 a0 00 00 48 8b 55 f8 48 c1 e2 03 > > > [ 226.145946] RSP: 002b:00007ffee4f22120 EFLAGS: 00010206 > > > [ 226.146745] RAX: 00007f226ac0f028 RBX: 00007ffee4f22448 RCX: 00007f226eca1bb4 > > > [ 226.147912] RDX: 00007f226ac0f000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 > > > [ 226.149093] RBP: 00007ffee4f22220 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > > > [ 226.150218] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 > > > [ 226.151313] R13: 00007ffee4f22458 R14: 0000561107c52dd8 R15: 00007f226ee34020 > > > [ 226.152464] </TASK> > > > [ 226.152802] irq event stamp: 3177751 > > > [ 226.153348] hardirqs last enabled at (3177761): [<ffffffff95d9fa69>] __up_console_sem+0x59/0x80 > > > [ 226.154679] hardirqs last disabled at (3177772): [<ffffffff95d9fa4e>] __up_console_sem+0x3e/0x80 > > > [ 226.155998] softirqs last enabled at (3177676): [<ffffffff95ccea54>] irq_exit_rcu+0x94/0xf0 > > > [ 226.157364] softirqs last disabled at (3177667): [<ffffffff95ccea54>] irq_exit_rcu+0x94/0xf0 > > > [ 226.158721] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > > > > > > CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK calls handle_mm_fault() in mm/memory.c > > > handle_mm_fault() may have an outdated comment, depending on what "mm > > > semaphore" means: > > > > > > * By the time we get here, we already hold the mm semaphore > > > > > > __handle_mm_fault+0x40a/0x470: > > > do_pte_missing at mm/memory.c:3672 > > > (inlined by) handle_pte_fault at mm/memory.c:4955 > > > (inlined by) __handle_mm_fault at mm/memory.c:5095 > > > > > > handle_userfault+0x34d/0xff0: > > > mmap_assert_write_locked at include/linux/mmap_lock.h:71 > > > (inlined by) __is_vma_write_locked at include/linux/mm.h:673 > > > (inlined by) vma_assert_locked at include/linux/mm.h:714 > > > (inlined by) assert_fault_locked at include/linux/mm.h:747 > > > (inlined by) handle_userfault at fs/userfaultfd.c:440 > > > > > > It looks like vma_assert_locked() is causing a problem if the mmap write > > > lock is not held in write mode. > > > > > > It looks to be an easy fix of checking the mmap_lock is held in write > > > mode in every other call location BUT the vma_assert_locked() path? > > > > Thanks Liam! Yes, the fix is indeed very simple. I missed the fact > > that __is_vma_write_locked() generates an assertion, which should > > probably be changed. I believe the same assertion is found by syzbot > > here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0000000000002db68f05ffb791bc@xxxxxxxxxx/#t > > Yeah, looks the same. Sorry for the noise. Not at all! I wouldn't look for it if you did not report :) Thanks! > > > I'll post a fix shortly. > > BTW, this is happening only in mm-unstable, right? > > Well, I tested it only in mm-unstable.. > > It came up while i was testing an unrelated fix for another kselftest:mm > that I broke. > > > Thanks, > Liam
