Instead of pte_lockptr(), use the recently added pte_offset_map_nolock() in adjust_pte(): because it gives the not-locked ptl for precisely that pte, which the caller can then safely lock; whereas pte_lockptr() is not so tightly coupled, because it dereferences the pmd pointer again. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c index ca5302b0b7ee..7cb125497976 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c @@ -117,11 +117,10 @@ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, * must use the nested version. This also means we need to * open-code the spin-locking. */ - pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address); + pte = pte_offset_map_nolock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, address, &ptl); if (!pte) return 0; - ptl = pte_lockptr(vma->vm_mm, pmd); do_pte_lock(ptl); ret = do_adjust_pte(vma, address, pfn, pte); -- 2.35.3
