Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Holger Hoffstätte <holger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 08:20:37 +0200
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx, mhocko@xxxxxxxx, vbabka@xxxxxxx, hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, liam.howlett@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ldufour@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxx, songliubraving@xxxxxx, peterx@xxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, hughd@xxxxxxxxxx, bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx, punit.agrawal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx, peterjung1337@xxxxxxxxx, rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx, chriscli@xxxxxxxxxx, axelrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxx, joelaf@xxxxxxxxxx, minchan@xxxxxxxxxx, rppt@xxxxxxxxxx, jannh@xxxxxxxxxx, shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx, tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAJuCfpFtdKdgXh4CUGMTWxc0De33S1LKyYDQ33jcE06Ad4Fcow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20230227173632.3292573-1-surenb@google.com> <20230227173632.3292573-30-surenb@google.com> <dbdef34c-3a07-5951-e1ae-e9c6e3cdf51b@kernel.org> <CAJuCfpF7LweMwpvXavjJZhAciK7wK-bdLz2aFhOZGSHeK5tA9A@mail.gmail.com> <9a8d788c-b8ba-1b8a-fd79-0e25b1b60bed@kernel.org> <f7ad7a42-13c8-a486-d0b7-01d5acf01e13@kernel.org> <f8864bb0-3d76-20d5-8a25-aab9726354f2@kernel.org> <CAJuCfpGLozRzxE9KZehgW1dAYpNxe4b+nnjH+ppbeAuFtRNGBQ@mail.gmail.com> <2f150512-e460-a9ae-65db-39dc54fe99d6@kernel.org> <b198d649-f4bf-b971-31d0-e8433ec2a34c@applied-asynchrony.com> <CAJuCfpFtdKdgXh4CUGMTWxc0De33S1LKyYDQ33jcE06Ad4Fcow@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0

On 06. 07. 23, 0:15, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:

Jiri, Holger, would you be able to try
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230705171213.2843068-2-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx/
and see if your issues still exist?


FWIW 6.4.3 (contains the series) is fine again.

thanks,
--
js
suse labs

References:
- [PATCH v4 00/33] Per-VMA locks
  - From: Suren Baghdasaryan
- [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Suren Baghdasaryan
- Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Jiri Slaby
- Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Suren Baghdasaryan
- Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Jiri Slaby
- Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Jiri Slaby
- Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Jiri Slaby
- Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Suren Baghdasaryan
- Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Jiri Slaby
- Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Holger Hoffstätte
- Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
  - From: Suren Baghdasaryan

Prev by Date: [linux-next:master 1208/1391] arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:29:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'iounmap'; did you mean 'vunmap'?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] mm/hotplug: Allow pageblock alignment via altmap reservation
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 29/33] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]