On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 5:21 PM Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 09:31:39PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 08:19:02PM +0000, Jiaqi Yan wrote: > > > Add the functionality, is_raw_hwp_subpage, to tell if a subpage of a > > > > This is incorrect naming. "subpage" was needed before we had the > > folio concept, but it should not be used any more. We have folios > > and pages now. > Thanks for your comment, Matthew. > I think we can address the raw hwpoison page by the offset in folio/hugepage > to eliminate the concept of "subpage". > > > > > Also, abbreviating "hwpoison" as "hwp" seems like a bad idea to me. > > hwp is already used as an acronym by acpi, intel_pstate, some clock > > drivers, an ethernet driver, and a scsi driver. > > I originally introduced the abbreviation "hwp" to avoid using a lengthy > function name such as "folio_test_hugetlb_raw_hwpoison_unreliable()." > Therefore, I prefer using "rawhwp" instead of a longer form like > "raw_hwpoison," although I don't expect any confusion between "hwp" and > "rawhwp." These are names in my mind, what do you think? * is_rawhwp_page_in_hugepage * is_raw_hwpoison_page_in_hugepage // I prefer this one * folio_test_hugetlb_raw_hwpoison_page > As for "hwp_walk", another user of "hwp" in in mm/memory-failure.c, > we can easily substitute it with "hwpoison_walk." In this "hwp_walk" case, I also prefer "hwpoison" than "hwp". I can create a separate renaming patch. > > Thanks, > Naoya Horiguchi
