On 2023/6/16 15:15, Shuai Xue wrote: > > > On 2023/6/6 15:42, Shuai Xue wrote: >> changes since v6: >> - add more explicty error message suggested by Xiaofei >> - pick up reviewed-by tag from Xiaofei >> - pick up internal reviewed-by tag from Baolin >> >> changes since v5 by addressing comments from Kefeng: >> - document return value of memory_failure() >> - drop redundant comments in call site of memory_failure() >> - make ghes_do_proc void and handle abnormal case within it >> - pick up reviewed-by tag from Kefeng Wang >> >> changes since v4 by addressing comments from Xiaofei: >> - do a force kill only for abnormal sync errors >> >> changes since v3 by addressing comments from Xiaofei: >> - do a force kill for abnormal memory failure error such as invalid PA, >> unexpected severity, OOM, etc >> - pcik up tested-by tag from Ma Wupeng >> >> changes since v2 by addressing comments from Naoya: >> - rename mce_task_work to sync_task_work >> - drop ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_MCE case in is_hest_sync_notify() >> - add steps to reproduce this problem in cover letter >> >> changes since v1: >> - synchronous events by notify type >> - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221206153354.92394-3-xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >> >> >> Shuai Xue (2): >> ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on >> synchronous events >> ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work >> >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 9 +-- >> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> include/acpi/ghes.h | 3 - >> mm/memory-failure.c | 17 +---- >> 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) >> > > > Hi, Rafael, > > Gentle ping. > > Are you happy to queue this patch set or anything I can do to improve it? > As @Kefeng said, this issue is met in Alibaba and Huawei products, we hope it > could be fixed ASAP. Hi Rafael, Tony, and Naoya, Gentle ping. I am sorry to see that we have missed v6.3 and v6.4 merge window since three Reviewed-by tags and one Tested-by tag. Do we still need any designated APEI reviewers Reviewed-by? Could you give me your Reviewed-by @Tony, and @Naoya if you are happy with the change. Or Please could you Ack this change if you are happy with the proposal and the change? @Rafael > > Thank you. > > Best Regards, > Shuai
