On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:43 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:34:27PM -0700, Arjun Roy wrote: > > However, with per-vma locking, both of these problems can be avoided. > > I appreciate your enthusiasm for this. However, applying this patch > completely wrecks my patch series to push per-vma locking down for > file-backed mappings. It would be helpful if we can back this out > for now and then apply it after that patch series. > > Would it make life hard for this patch to go through the mm tree? > No worries, can you send a formal revert then ? (With some details, because I do not see why you can not simply add the revert in front of your series ?) Thanks.
