Would the information “test_maple_tree: …” be more appropriate for the subsystem specification in the patch subject? > The original code initializes 'entry' > twice in line 3229 and 3232, which > causes duplicate initialization issue. > To fix this, we remove the initialization > of 'entry' in line 3229. * Why did you choose 41 characters as a line length maximum for your change description? * Would you like to achieve reconsiderations of implementation details by other means than patches? * How do you think about to clarify the usage of affected variable assignments better? * What does hinder you to take any requirements from the Linux development documentation better into account? See also: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.4 Regards, Markus
