On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 4:36 PM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 06/23/23 16:40, Jiaqi Yan wrote: > > Traversal on llist (e.g. llist_for_each_safe) is only safe AFTER entries > > are deleted from the llist. > > > > llist_del_all are lock free with itself. folio_clear_hugetlb_hwpoison()s > > from __update_and_free_hugetlb_folio and memory_failure won't need > > explicit locking when freeing the raw_hwp_list. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > mm/memory-failure.c | 8 +++----- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > After updating the reason for patch in commit message as suggested by Naoya, Thank you both Mike and Naoya! I will add the explanation in the next version. > > Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > -- > Mike Kravetz > > > > > diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c > > index 004a02f44271..c415c3c462a3 100644 > > --- a/mm/memory-failure.c > > +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c > > @@ -1825,12 +1825,11 @@ static inline struct llist_head *raw_hwp_list_head(struct folio *folio) > > > > static unsigned long __folio_free_raw_hwp(struct folio *folio, bool move_flag) > > { > > - struct llist_head *head; > > - struct llist_node *t, *tnode; > > + struct llist_node *t, *tnode, *head; > > unsigned long count = 0; > > > > - head = raw_hwp_list_head(folio); > > - llist_for_each_safe(tnode, t, head->first) { > > + head = llist_del_all(raw_hwp_list_head(folio)); > > + llist_for_each_safe(tnode, t, head) { > > struct raw_hwp_page *p = container_of(tnode, struct raw_hwp_page, node); > > > > if (move_flag) > > @@ -1840,7 +1839,6 @@ static unsigned long __folio_free_raw_hwp(struct folio *folio, bool move_flag) > > kfree(p); > > count++; > > } > > - llist_del_all(head); > > return count; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.41.0.162.gfafddb0af9-goog > >