On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 9:14 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 8:49 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 10:51:57 +0200 "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >>> I'm in wait-a-few-days-mode on this. To see if we have a backportable > > > >>> fix rather than disabling the feature in -stable. > > > > > > Andrew, how long will you remain in "wait-a-few-days-mode"? Given what > > > Greg said below and that we already had three reports I know of I'd > > > prefer if we could fix this rather sooner than later in mainline -- > > > especially as Arch Linux and openSUSE Tumbleweed likely have switched to > > > 6.4.y already or will do so soon. > > > > I'll send today's 2-patch series to Linus today or tomorrow. > > I need to make a correction to the patch fixing the issue (the first > one in the series) and will post it within an hour. Thanks! Corrected patch is posted at https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230705171213.2843068-2-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx/. The other patch is unchanged but I posted v3 of the entire patchset anyway. Andrew, could you please replace the old version with this one before sending it to Linus? Thanks, Suren.